 |
Questa pagina è stata trascritta, formattata e riletta. | |
Auerbach D. (2014), Encyclopedia Frown, in Slate, 11/12/2014; https://slate.com/technology/2014/12/wikipedia-editing-disputes-the-crowdsourced-encyclopedia-has-become-a-rancorous-sexist-mess.html
Benjakob O., Aviram R. (2018), A Clockwork Wikipedia: From a Broad Perspective to a Case Study, in Journal of biological rhythms 33 (3), 233-244; https://doi.org/10.1177/0748730418768120
Bould M.D., Hladkowicz E.S., Pigford A.E., Ufholz L., Postonogova T., Shin E. et al. (2014) References that anyone can edit: review of Wikipedia citations in peer reviewed health science literature, in British Medical Journal, 2014, 348; https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g1585
Casebourne I., Davies C., Fernandes M., Norman N. (2012), Assessing the accuracy and quality of Wikipedia entries compared to popular online encyclopaedias: a comparative preliminary study across disciplines in English, Spanish and Arabic. Brighton, Epic; http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:EPIC_Oxford_report.pdf
Catalani L. (2017), I progetti Wikimedia per l’apprendimento delle competenze informative e digitali in biblioteca, la scuola, nelle università, in AIB Studi, 57(2), 253-256; https://doi.org/10.2426/ aibstudi-11654
Catalani L. (2020), Come educare al sapere libero nella biblioteca scolastica, Editrice Bibliografica, 2020; ISBN 978-88-9357-126-5
Catalani L. (2021), La tecnologia wiki come spazio per il dialogo operativo tra filosofia e informatica, in Quaderni di «Filosofia», 2021, 47-57; http://mimesisbooks.com/index.php/mim/catalog/book/10
Chesney, T. (2006), An empirical examination of Wikipedia’s credibility, in First Monday, 11(11); https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v11i11.1413
